Saturday, March 29, 2008

Trying to think deep thoughts.

For years now, I've wanted to be a lawyer. I do enjoy following legal news, and I'm on the debate and Model UN teams. I took a criminal law class and loved it. I'm taking Criminology now and loving it. But I don't know if actually being a lawyer is for me.

In December, I was one of the attorneys for a court-martial committee at PMUNC. I was so excited to get into the committee in the first place, and I was downright ecstatic when I found out that I would be a prosecutor. I then went to the conference and hated every minute of every committee session. I'm still going over the experience in my head trying to figure out whether I just didn't like being a lawyer or whether I was bothered by factors specific to the conference of the case itself.

There were so many little things that really bothered me about the whole thing. I hated having to push for the death penalty or life imprisonment for a defendant that I thought was innocent (or at least, not intentionally responsible for the crime). And then, one of my fellow prosecutors was a real prick, to put it nicely. There was another (younger) kid from his high school on the prosecution team as well, who basically seemed to be the prick's protégé. The fourth prosecutor was nice enough, but he was a senior already committed to Columbia (for sports) and didn't give a damn about winning. Of course, the prick and his protégé also had hard-core mock trial experience, and, had we been facing off one-on-one, would have beat the crap out of me. My school didn't start things going for mock trial until after the conference and I didn't make the team last year (not surprising. I was a freshman.). So they were good, they knew they were good, and they thought I was completely inept. I wasn't even allowed to argue with him and point out his (many, IMO) logical fallacies since he was on my team.

My ineptitude was probably real, too--I didn't practice examining any witnesses, and I basically had no idea what I was doing. In his background guide, the chair had stressed that we wouldn't be following real trial procedure. Then, we followed real trial procedure. Imagine my surprise. I hated the feeling of fighting against the current the whole way, knowing I had absolutely no chance of getting an award.

And then there's the whole I-was-exhausted explanation. I wasn't getting enough sleep, I wasn't eating normal foods, I knew that a pile of homework awaited me on Sunday evening when I got home, and I missed my family.

All of the problems I had with the conference and the committee probably contributed to the general unhappiness I had when I was there, but as of now, I think that the cause was a combination of the above plus one actual issue I had.

My favorite part of both debate and Model UN is when I get to argue back and forth with someone. I love it when you ask the perfect question and the kid has no idea how to answer you, so he says something that gives you the perfect followup. And then you sit down and your partner smiles and says Good job as he gets up to make a speech and then you bounce happily all the way through it.

I really missed that. There was no direct back-and-forth, you couldn't one-up people who agreed with you, and you had no chance to really out-logic the people you were trying to beat.

So I've decided that maybe being a trial lawyer isn't for me.

(More to come on this--maybe tomorrow.)

1 comment:

paratactics said...

Aww, I'm the one who says "Good job." Hehe. Debate tomorrow!

My dad was just part of a trial in Alaska over the schizophrenia drug Zyprexa. You might not argue back and forth with other lawyers, but you certainly cross-examine witnesses and get to make distorted conclusions based on what they say. (My dad was an expert witness.)